Call to Action: City Council Budget Public Hearing March 16, 2020

Calling Bike Durham Advocates!

UPDATE: In light of the COVID-19 containment recommendations, the City is asking that all comments for Monday's City Council public budget hearing to be submitted electronically. 

There are 2 ways to be heard: 

  1. Send in comments on the budget by email at council@durhamnc.gov

  2. Answer the 3 short questions in our survey by clicking the button below. We’ll gather your responses and present them to the Council. Please respond by tomorrow, Monday, March 16 at 5pm.

If you would like to watch the hearing, you can tune in online via video livestream on Monday at 7pm.

Tl;dr: Our request

1. Support the proposed FY2020-21 Durham Department of Transportation budget and all the capital project requests for infrastructure to improve walking and biking facilities.

2. Fully fund the 2017 Bike + Walk Plan

3. Establish a quick-build program budget of $500,000 in FY 2021 for a Low-Stress Network and on-street transit reliability improvements. Continue this program, committing $4m annually through 2025.

We do not accept that traffic deaths are an inevitable price to pay for our mobility.

In Durham County during the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were:

  • 1,094 crashes between people driving cars and people walking (855) or biking (239)

  • 30 people were killed and 53 were suspected to have serious injuries

  • African-Americans who were walking and biking were disproportionately victims of crashes compared with their representation in the county population, especially among those who were killed or seriously injured while walking

Source: NCDOT 2014-2018

Proposal for a City-Wide Low-Stress Network

In support of the City’s Vision Zero initiative, its values for creating an equitable Durham, and the Mayor’s call for cities to lead in fighting climate change, Bike Durham proposes creation of a city-wide “Low-Stress Network” of protected (“light individualized transportation” or LIT) lanes and intersections, slow streets (aka Neighborhood Bike Routes), and greenways for all residents to safely walk, ride bikes or scooters, or use wheelchairs to travel around Durham.

We commend the progress that the City Council and staff have been making to establish strong goals and in planning new projects that designate LIT lanes or that improve transit schedule reliability. However, we find the following shortcomings to the current approach:

  • Project delivery is taking too long

  • Project designs and installations do not reliably include slowing traffic or physical barriers for protection of vulnerable LIT users

  • The piecemeal funding by project, rather than program, results in isolated projects rather than a more usable network

Our Ask of the Durham City Council:

Fully fund the remaining projects in the Bike+Walk Plan that are capital projects not well-suited to a Quick-Build approach.

Reduce posted speed limits on designated Neighborhood Bike Routes to 20 miles per hour. Add traffic calming measures as needed until 80% of drivers travel below that speed.

Set a goal of 125 new miles of a “Low-Stress Network” of slow streets, protected LIT lanes, and greenways by 2025.

Establish policy that all new on-street LIT lanes on streets with speed limits over 25 mph will provide physical separation from traffic through vertical barriers and protected intersections.

Create a team of staff to develop a Quick-Build program for delivering projects, by March 2021, using low-cost, temporary materials (versus civil works construction) that considers the engagement period to extend past installation of the initial design.

Establish a Quick-Build program budget of $500,000 in FY2021 and $4,000,000 annually through 2025 to fund a Low-Stress Network and on-street transit reliability improvements so that staff can proceed with developing a quick-build approach with confidence that the projects have the funding available for implementation.

Request the staff to report on progress annually in terms of mileage of Low-Stress Network implemented and improvements to transit time reliability.

2019 Bike Durham Year in Review

Perhaps our biggest achievement in 2019 was ending the year under contract with a part-time Executive Director, John Tallmadge, who will be carrying our momentum into 2020 as our first paid staff person. We have significant growth in store for 2020 and to motivate us this year, we wanted to reflect on last year’s successes!

Advocacy

  • We envisioned a Low Stress Network of Light Individual Transportation (LIT) lanes in Durham, designing comprehensive maps that will be shared with various community groups for input before presenting to the city.

  • The Ride of Silence, which honors cyclists who have been killed or injured while biking, and our Jack-O-Lantern tactical urbanism project, in which we placed pumpkins along the unprotected bike lane on Broad Street, drew attention to the need for bike safety infrastructure and garnered coverage from ABC11, CBS17, the Herald Sun, News & Observer, IndyWeek, and Streetsblog.

Events and Rides

  • We hosted Bike-a-Bull City, our annual fall event, which included three community bike rides, a kids’ bike rodeo, a maintenance clinic, and a raffle at the family-friendly Scrap Exchange.

  • Board member Jen McDuffie led 22 Bike/Walk to School events in addition to several Bike Safety classes in Durham Public Schools, and she helped city staff write a state grant to transfer ownership of these programs to the Durham Dept. of Transportation going forward (Bike Durham will still contribute volunteers).

  • We hosted three summer community rides to Audio Under the Stars, an outdoor storytelling event at the Center for Documentary Studies. 

  • We tabled at the Eno River Festival, Durham Co-op Market, and the Farmers’ Market, among other events, and we offered bike valet along with BPAC at the Center Fest Arts Festival.

  • We hosted monthly community meetings, with featured guests like Alta Planning & Design, Leah Shahum, the Founder and Director of Vision Zero, and Sean Egan, the City’s new Director of Transportation.

  • We demonstrated our holiday spirit and sweet rides, including some cool e-bikes, in the Durham Holiday Parade.

Membership and Engagement

  • We’ve grown our membership to 223 current, renewing member individuals or households.

  • We raffled off a brand-new bike (valued at $2,000) as part of our summer membership drive.

  • Our monthly newsletter subscribers have increased 41% since February; Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram followers are up an average of 26%.

Community Connections and Capacity Building

  • We started a business membership program and now have support from business partners such as Visual Rituals and soon the Triangle Rock Club of Durham.

  • We now conduct board and committee meetings at ReCity, a co-working space that we share with several other social justice non-profits.

  • Working with BPAC, bike shops, and many other organizations, we promoted 20 Bike Month events in May including seven Bike-to-Work Day pit stops.

  • Through financial sponsorship and volunteering, we contributed to the Untokening Conference, a multiracial collective and gathering that centers the lived experiences of marginalized communities to address mobility justice and equity.

  • To learn more about systemic racism and how we can continue pushing for equity in our work and diversity in our organization, the board attended a ½ day workshop by the Racial Equity Institute

  • We partnered on a Durham 150 grant with BPAC that contributed to Bike Month and other events and provided helmets to those in need. We also secured a donation from Lyft and raised funds through Facebook fundraisers.

Durham County Commissioner Candidate Questionnaire

UPDATE—Congratulations to the winners of the March 3 primary election:  Nida Allam, Nimasheena Burns, Heidi Carter, Brenda Howerton, and Wendy Jacobs.

In advance of the Durham County Board of Commissioners Democratic primary election (since all 15 candidates are Democrats, the primary will determine the Board), Bike Durham asked the candidates a series of questions about their personal experiences and policy positions regarding transportation in Durham County.

Click here for a list of candidates, with links to their responses.

The questionnaire began with a statement from Bike Durham, as follows:

About Bike Durham

Bike Durham (BD) was created as a membership organization in 2012 by a group of Durham residents who wanted city streets that were safer and friendlier for bike riders to increase the number of riders in the County. Over time, the organization’s lens widened and its focus sharpened. The organization is no longer just about biking. We are an organization of more than 200 individuals and households that supports people who are walking, biking, riding transit, using electric wheelchairs, e-scooters, or other emerging light individual transportation (LIT) devices by calling for safe designs and improved services for all.  

We are motivated to achieve three goals:

Zero Disparity of Access

We acknowledge that the current transportation system is inequitable and compounds the disadvantages of Durham’s lowest-income residents, predominantly people of color.

Most of the founders and current members of BD are white, and choose to bike, but also have the option of driving cars. Though we come from a position of white privilege, we are committed to the internal and external work of equity. In 2018, the Board attended racial equity training, joined an inclusive co-working space focused on social impact, and re-wrote our statement of purpose to read:  “We believe that everyone should have access to safe and affordable transportation regardless of race, wealth, gender identity, ability or where they live. Biking and walking are the most healthy and sustainable ways to move. Bike Durham promotes policy, infrastructure, education, and community events to make Durham more equitable; empowering people of all ages to walk and bike more.”

Zero traffic deaths

We want an acceleration of changes to the designs of streets and intersections to make the system safe for all users. We will continue to raise awareness of the traffic violence that exists on our streets. We will build on the success we’ve had activating our members and community partners to support road diets and a new City staff position dedicated to walking and biking infrastructure. 

Zero Carbon Emissions

We believe that our transportation system must transition to be emissions-free by 2050, and to that end, we should prioritize a significant shift to travel by walking, biking, riding transit, and using other zero-emission light individual transportation (LIT) devices.

We received responses from nine candidates, listed below. We did not receive responses from Nimasheena Burns, Patrick Byker, Fred Foster Jr., James Hill, Brenda Howerton, or John Rooks Jr.

Make your voice heard: Remember to vote! Early voting started February 23 and runs through February 29. The primary election will be held March 3.

Responding Candidates

Nida Allam

Nate Baker

Levon Barnes

Heidi Carter

Tara Fikes

Wendy Jacobs

Matt Kopac

Regina Mays

Michael Page

Bike Durham does not endorse or oppose any of the candidates for public office, and we believe that candidates’ fitness for office should be judged on a variety of qualifications that go beyond their responses to these questions.


Nida Allam

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so? 

When I’m closer to the downtown area, I walk as much as possible. That being said, most of my commuting is done with my car, unfortunately. I think the same factors that prevent me from using alternative modes of transportation are the same that prevent most residents of Durham from doing so. First, the bus lines are too scarce, too infrequent and too unreliable. I live in eastern Durham where the closest bus stop from my home is nearly 3 miles away, a 44-minute walk on roads with no sidewalks. Unfortunately, policymakers in Durham and across the South have treated public transportation as a necessity for those who don’t have a car, and a burden to everyone else. We need to fundamentally reorient our perspective on public transportation to one where we recognize the necessity of clean, alternative transportation as a necessity not only for low income folks today, but for future generations as well. 

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go? 

If I ride transit, I mainly do so during the day and feel very safe. In terms of getting where I need to go, I would reiterate the points I made above. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025. 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response. 

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

I completely agree. 

We need to ensure that all future road plans include safe, wide bike lanes. In Europe and many parts of the US, bike lanes in very busy areas are protected by actual mini medians. I think we need this in Durham, where more and more people are biking but car drivers have not fully grasped the importance of sharing the road. One of my supporters recently told me about witnessing an accident like those listed above. At the corner of Buchanan and Main street last summer, a bike rider was struck by a car and was immediately knocked unconscious. Had it not been for the helmet, my supporter said, this rider would likely be dead. Even with the helmet, there was bleeding coming from his head and he was unresponsive while this supporter tried to help. An ambulance finally showed up, but we have no idea how the rider fared after that. Accidents like these are horrific, particularly when we consider how preventable they are. I will admit I am not an expert on bikes or bike policy, so I am excited to hear about your “low-stress Durham” proposal, and I’m just as excited to support it as county commissioner. 

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars. 

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes? Why or why not? 

First let me express how much I appreciate the way this question is posed. At its core, this question asks how my policies will be intersectional. I would absolutely prioritize the policy described in the question. The county does not have much jurisdiction over housing policy, but the county, the city and DHA have agreed that addressing the housing crisis will require collaboration on every front. From my view, affordable housing needs to center community strength and resilience, as opposed to merely providing a stripped building in which to hold low income folks. Therefore, future housing developments in Durham need to be built in sync with social services, education, meaningful employment and access to fresh, affordable food. We do this by ensuring that all new affordable housing be built to the most rigorous LEED standards, installing solar panels belonging to the community in a cooperative ownership model. In these affordable housing developments, we need the government to provide social workers and basic health services, so that no family has to travel across the city to be charged $50 or more at urgent care for a fever. We also need to leverage the procurement powers of county and city government not only to solicit services and goods from minority owned businesses, but to actually invest in the creation of worker-owned cooperative enterprises in these communities. There is also an amazing opportunity in the County Transit and Comprehensive Plans in that we can actually employ low income folks in the infrastructural work needed to satisfy those plans. Cities like Jackson, Mississippi and Jacksonville, Florida have demonstrated how municipal infrastructure projects can actually be used as a vehicle to establish new democratically run worker cooperatives. I believe we can and should do the same in Durham. 

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050? 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you. 

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Completely agree. 

2050 is not fast enough. Any policy passed at the county or city level must prioritize achieving zero emissions as quickly as possible. Whether we’re discussing education policy, taxes or public transit, policy makers need to make sure that everything we do will in some way contribute to achieving zero emissions immediately. 

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham? 

As commissioner, I want to continue to fight for light rail in the Triangle by fighting back against Duke using grassroots organizing and every policy lever available to me in office. We need to work with GoTriangle to expand bus service and create a digital scheduling system which will allow for more accurate stop times. These plans need to have tangible benchmarks that get Durham to eliminate public transportation fares for all riders as quickly as possible. 

I would also like to work with the Durham Bike co-op to pilot a genuine bike share program that will be free or very inexpensive to Durham residents. The co-op does a great job collecting bikes (including the defunct bike share ones of last year), and repairing them, as well as keeping their workshop open to encourage riders to have autonomy over maintaining their bikes. I want to expand this model into low income neighborhoods, and leverage county funding to help sponsor low income folks to become members of the co-op. A bike share program should work to increase mobility and equity among low income people. 

Finally, I also want to continue construction of greenways so that pedestrians and bikers have alternate routes to their destination which keep them safe from vehicular traffic. 

Back to list

Nate Baker

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

As an urban planner with a decade of experience helping city and county governments expand transportation options, and as an active transportation advocate, I try to help the communities that I work in think critically about what they want. That includes how they truly wish they were able to travel around. To that end, in the community meetings that we help city and county governments prepare, we often ask two key questions: “What mode of transportation do you currently use to get to work/school/grocery store/parks?” and, “If you could choose, what mode of transportation would you use to get to those places?” The results are shocking. Whether we are in small towns or dense metro areas, we hear the same thing over and over: Americans are stuck for significant amounts of time each day getting to places by car, when they would rather travel using more active and sustainable options. That is unacceptable and I have made it my mission to end it. But Durham continues moving rapidly in the wrong direction, and I am running to call attention to it and radically change the way we build our infrastructure.

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I do walk, bike, and take transit in Durham. In general, I do not feel safe seeing people ride their bikes in Durham. Our infrastructure is not designed for pedestrians or bicyclists and it continues that way - we continue to build or streets and roads that way. Only 4 percent of Durham residents realistically have the option of commuting by any form of transportation other than an automobile. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025.  

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

Full Agree - This is a great example of how well-meaning progressive elected officials unknowingly perpetuate a racist and environmentally insensitive system, simply by allowing the status quo of transportation and land use policy to remain in place. The truth is, non-automotive transportation is actually cheaper over time and requires less maintenance and replacement. I will be a champion for this cause, and establish the land use policies to support it.

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars.  

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes? Why or why not?

Absolutely. And we need elected officials who understand what this means, otherwise it will not likely happen. We need to establish this policy in the comprehensive plan—but that is only a first step. There are many excellent transportation and sustainability policies in the current comprehensive plan that are not used by our planners and elected officials. We need to ensure the policy is baked into multiple aspects of our transportation cross-sections and UDO articles. My day job and expertise is writing comprehensive plan and comprehensive zoning ordinance rewrite projects, and I know in detail what needs to change here in Durham.

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050?   

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Yes—Agree—and I have made a campaign commitment to achieve community-wide emissions by 2045, in accordance with the timeline issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The County’s 2018 Renewable Energy Resolution calls for 100 percent clean energy in County operations by 2050. But County operations make up less than two percent of countywide emissions, leaving over 98% emissions from remaining sources throughout the County unaddressed, including transportation. In other words—it is nowhere near good enough. That must change. 

I will enact land use reform in Durham that:

  • Uses existing resources to establish a Neighborhood and Corridor Planning division and Growth Management division in City-County government that conduct ongoing planning and robust public engagement

  • Ensures new complete streets are actually complete streets and offer safe and viable multimodal transportation options

  • Overhauls Durham zoning regulations to end sprawl; permit pedestrian-oriented development only; protect open space, farmland, and wildlife habitat corridors

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham?

According to the Durham City-County Resident Satisfaction Survey, between 2016 and 2019 the Durham community gave bicycle facilities a flat ranking of 38 out of 100, with no improvement over three years. I am running as a system change candidate, ready to intervene to enact aggressive and transformative changes to our broken land use, transportation, and development framework. Durham remains a solidly car-dependent city. Even with the new comprehensive plan, it will remain auto-dependent—more so for those without the resources now needed to live in the few walkable locations that exist—unless we have elected officials with the experience and commitment necessary to enact meaningful change in how we grow, develop, and get around. 

Back to list

Levon Barnes

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so? 

Any opportunity I can get to walk or bike in Durham I try. I’m not the strongest cyclist anymore but I own a bike. I have multiple walking and bike trails where I live that I try and utilize everyday. I however do not take rapid transit much because the school I teach at (The School for Creative Studies) does not have a bus line that goes that far. When we connect the city to the county I will be the first to ride that bus. 

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go? 

I feel safe walking and riding in the city of Durham, and I’m fortunate that I live in an area of town (Southpoint) with consistent bus service and lots of sidewalks, though we could certainly use more especially going over I-40 towards Southpoint Mall. I know that the majority of the city does not have this privilege and that many residents live in areas where bus service is limited or unavailable and don’t have access to sidewalks or safe bike lanes for cycling. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025. 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response. 

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

First, can I go past “Agree”, but I fully support the concept of a low-stress bicycle network and agree that it’s important to create the network as a whole, rather than in pieces, so that any user who takes advantage can commute safely. I believe this is an important priority for Durham’s transportation future and that sustainable transportation infrastructure needs to be a higher priority in county spending plans. Both growth and climate change raise the importance of this issue more each year. As your next County Commissioner, I look forward to supporting funding requests for this work. I thank Bike Durham for putting this in place and advocating for its completion. 

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars. 

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes? Why or why not? 

No question, I think the biggest issue facing Durham County is economic inequality and the wealth gap for people of color. A major barrier for low-resourced people, people of color and with disabilities is access to efficient and reliable transportation. The residents who live in McDougald Terrace, Oxford Manor, Braggtown and Oldham Towers have a value and skill sets that can be put to great use. So between Durham Technical Community College, North Carolina Central University, and Duke University, a partnership should be formed that brings the resources for education to those communities directly. This will not just foster trust between communities in government but most importantly can change the culture for a whole generation of people. 

The city and county should work together in providing free or reduced bus passes for residents including seniors to get around the city and county. If we can not put programs and policies in place then the gentrification will continue and the gap will be beyond repairable. I believe that the focus on building this wealth comes from education and fostering black and brown entrepreneurship opportunities through grants and partnerships. 

5There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050? 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

I was just endorsed by the Sierra Club, so the environment is an important issue for me. I fear for the next generation that there will not be a planet that is safe enough for them to go outside and play. I wish there was an option past agree. Durham must lead the region and the South in transitioning to renewable energy to combat climate change. Durham is projected to have over 350,000 people by 2030! Can you imagine the impact that will have on our environment? With crumbling streets and infrastructure, heavy traffic and pollution the carbon impact will be devastating and irreparable. We must have a greener public transportation system and while that mostly relies on the city, the county will play an integral role in shaping the regional transportation system for our next generation. With the disaster of light rail and the 150 million-dollar investment of public dollars, we must look at increasing the city-county connectivity with our bus system. I would propose an investment in solar and electric buses to include bus-only HOV lanes. Commuter rail is a long-term option but before I would commit those public dollars I would want guarantees from all stakeholders to sign a contract through completion. Commuter rail that connects the Triangle would have a significant impact environmentally and economically to our region. 

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham? 

I am beyond committed to safe, affordable and clean transportation in Durham County. We are at the point of no return, as our county continues to grow and be a destination for people all over the world, we must be out front in reducing our imprint on the environment and being proactive in what mass transit looks like. In Durham, we have the ability to do this but do we have the will. Organizations like Bike Durham are important in advocating the needs of transportation and you have a friend and champion in me to put the necessary resources together for this project and others. 

Back to list

Heidi Carter

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

I currently walk and bike frequently, as both a means of recreation and as a way to travel.  I am very fortunate to live close to the American Tobacco Trail and have a safe route to bike downtown for work, meetings and events.  I recognize what a tremendous privilege it is to live near a connected route of safe lanes for travel by bike or by foot, and I believe it is important to increase the number of connected lanes where all people will be and feel safe to bike, walk and roll.

I occasionally take a Go Durham bus, but I would like to ride the bus much more often as a way to decrease traffic congestion and harmful carbon emissions from single occupancy vehicle travel.  If the bus schedule was more frequent and reliable, it would be more convenient for me to make the switch from driving to taking public transit. Once again, I recognize that I am privileged to have the choice of how I travel.  Most of the riders of Go Durham do not own a car and have no other option. We must invest in public transit so that those who rely on the bus can get to their jobs and the services they need on time every day every time and so that more residents will start riding the bus to replace their car trips.  

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I feel relatively safe when I bike, but I stick to biking on the ATT or on the bike lanes we have in Durham.  I do not feel nearly as safe when I ride on a street without bike lanes, and I would feel much safer if all our bike lanes were physically protected from vehicular traffic.  

I live in a relatively walkable community and am so lucky that I can safely bike or walk to grocery stores, the mall, the bank, the gym, and much more.  It is important that as Durham continues to grow that we do so in ways that promote more equitable access to safe infrastructure for biking and walking, as well as significantly improved local bus and regional transit service.  

I also am very fortunate to live in an area where rates of crime are low.  I do not worry about being a victim of crime when I walk, bike or run in my neighborhood.  There have been acts of crime along the American Tobacco Trail over the years, but for the most part, I feel safe using this trail during daylight hours.  I consider the ATT to be one of the top amenities in Durham and love living nearby and using it regularly. My vision for Durham includes more equitable access to greenways and safe pathways for recreation and travel.  

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025.  

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

A public engagement process to develop a new County transit plan has just begun, and I am eager to learn more about the community's priorities and suggestions, but I fully agree that it makes good sense to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan

Protected lanes for light individual transportation can be less expensive and constructed more quickly, if government officials in the County and the City commit to making it happen. I look forward to learning more about the projected costs, but I expect the investment will have a good rate of financial and social return.  Compared to light rail or commuter rail, investment in a low stress network of protected lanes will be dramatically less expensive, and the construction of such will be much, much faster.  

While I certainly support a strong regional transit system with commuter rail and bus rapid transit along high-travel corridors, we cannot wait for a decade or more to complete these projects to start to improve our local transit options, including a low stress network of projects we can rapidly deploy.  This is also an issue of racial equity, as our local data shows. We must make it safer for people of color to move by bike and by foot, so we can eliminate disparities in safety and health outcomes related to transit.  

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars.  

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes?  Why or why not?

Yes, I agree to keep this as a top priority.  Sustainable, reliable transportation to jobs and services is one of the major social determinants of health, education and economic outcomes for people.  To reduce disparities in each of these interlocked areas that are central for shared prosperity, we must also reduce inequities in access to transportation. 

There is sound research that correlates economic mobility and transit access.  For example, studies from Harvard and NYU show that geographic mobility (including availability of jobs within a 30 minute commute) is linked to economic mobility: by providing better transit access to reach more jobs within a shorter amount of time, we can help residents with fewer resources to increase their incomes.

“Stranded: How America's Failing Public Transportation Increases Inequality” from The Atlantic

And finally, an efficient and effective public transit system can save people a lot of money! If families can get by with 1 car instead of 2, or no cars instead of 1, they can save substantial funds that can be used for groceries, healthcare, tuition or other priorities. For example, Indianapolis calculated that many local families could save $1900 a year on decreased transportation costs, which could cover tuition at the local community college.

“Fighting Poverty through Access to Transportation” from Spotlight

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050?   

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Thank you for asking about the climate crisis and noting the important connection to transportation. I strongly agree that we must both shift our public transit system to zero carbon emissions and that we can and must reduce our community-wide transportation emissions to net zero.

To choose a single first step is difficult, because it will take dramatic changes to much of our transportation and planning systems to reach these necessary carbon emissions reduction goals.

First, we should use county transit funds for a network of protected lanes for active transportation. These protected lanes can use quick-build strategies to most rapidly get more people walking, biking and riding scooters instead of driving, and other cities have seen those measures as transformational. Increasing funding for public transit in both capital and operating expenditures can make buses more frequent and more reliable so that more commuters will depend on them, and we should pursue aggressive and innovative transportation demand management programs to make transit more convenient and accessible than driving alone. We must also think about changes that have a slower but longer-term effect: enabling transit-oriented development (as opposed to increased sprawl at the urban fringe) will make it more feasible and more economical for residents to use buses, bikes and scooters to get to school, work and services.

For county operations in particular, we must do much better to reduce emissions from our fleet of vehicles, which have increased over the past decade. One strategy is to begin a “shared fleet” approach where staff members share vehicles rather than having one per person who drives as part of their job. We will also need to shift more of our vehicles — both buses and County operations vehicles — to running on electricity rather than fossil fuel, so we can then take advantage of shifts to renewable sources for electricity generation. Migrating our buses to running on electricity by 2035 is a feasible and important goal. It will save us money that we currently spend on fossil fuel and the public health impacts of air pollution on residents. But our highest priority needs to be a shift in “mode share”: we need to get ourselves and our neighbors out of our cars and onto buses and trains, as well as walking, biking and rolling.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham?

I really appreciate that Bike Durham is explicitly noting the privileges (racial, economic or otherwise) of its board members and identifying distinct goals about access, safety and emissions reduction. I have emphasized throughout this campaign that my guiding principles are racial equity and environmental sustainability, and it’s particularly important to identify cases where those principles can work in harmony, as they often do. As you’ve noted throughout your questions here, transportation is a key issue of racial justice: because low-income residents and people of color disproportionately rely on our public transit system for access to jobs and services, because traffic violence impacts everyone but most often those people who are poor or live in black and brown neighborhoods and because climate change will have the greatest effects on our most vulnerable during floods, hurricanes and heat waves. My family and I are proud members of Bike Durham, and I applaud this statement of your three goals.

If re-elected, my commitment will be to bike or ride the bus to work one day every week in my next term as County Commissioner, to make sure these issues of access and equity remain front and center in my mind.  I encourage you all to join me on the bus!

Back to list

Tara Fikes

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

While I do occasionally walk for exercise in Durham County, I do not bike and/or ride transit in Durham County. I do not bike now because of knee issues and I do not ride transit buses because it is not convenient to do so. I would have to walk approximately 1.5 miles to get to the nearest bus stop.   

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

When I walk for exercise, I do feel safe in the community and have access to adequate walking trails—e.g. the American Tobacco Trail. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025.  

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Agree

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars.  

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes?  Why or why not?

Yes, I can agree with increasing the number of jobs available to the persons identified above.  It is my hope that the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan will include the need for transit that serves our employment and education “hubs” in the community so that everyone particularly those less likely to own private cars can access jobs and educational opportunities. 

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050?   

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Agree.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham?

Admittedly, I am still learning about the impact of net emissions on the climate and the environment. However, it is clear that as a country we must reduce the pollutants that come from greenhouse gas emissions in order to affect the negative consequences of climate change such as global warming which is leading to heat waves, droughts and severe storms. That urgency naturally must be adopted by local communities such as Durham in order to help the country achieve this goal. In terms of transit, I am aware that many large cities in the country are beginning to invest in electric buses as a way to operate cleaner transit systems. I would suspect that will soon be a logical conversation (if it is not already happening) for Durham as well. Therefore, I am totally committed to advocating for safe, affordable and clean transportation in Durham and exploring solutions such as electric buses that will help us achieve that goal.

Back to list

Wendy Jacobs

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County?

Yes. I walk as much as I can as part of my work life, mostly in downtown Durham. I also bike and walk for pleasure and exercise.  

If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

I do not live near a transit stop/bus line (I am within an unincorporated area of the county). I also am very car dependent because of my work schedule and demands as a county commissioner.

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe?

I feel safe most of the time. When I am walking back to my car/the county parking garage late at night and I am alone, that portion of East Main Street can be unlit and deserted of street life and people. That is when I can feel vulnerable and do not feel safe.

Can you get where you need to go?

Yes, I can always get to where I need to go because I have a car, although I may often spend time sitting in traffic!

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025.  

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Agree. This sounds like a great idea that I would like to learn more about. The rate of pedestrian and bicycle injuries and deaths is horrifying and inexcusable. I was not aware that this was also such a racial-disparity issue as well. I would also not be surprised if it is a racial- and economic-disparity issue if we looked further at the data. This must be addressed. People must also change their behavior. In Durham, we can often not even get drivers to stop at crosswalks or safely share the road with bike riders or pedestrians. I agree that there must be safe and protected non-vehicle ways for people to get where they need to go. 

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars.  

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes?

I agree that this should be a first priority to consider but I would need more information about what low income people, people of color and people with disabilities consider their priorities to be in order to assess whether this should be the first priority.

Why or why not?

As I indicated, I would not determine what should be the first priority as we update the County Transit and Comprehensive Plans without hearing what priorities come out of the intentional efforts underway right now to have a robust ENGAGEDurham community engagement process that is making a very deliberate and intentional effort with its Ambassadors Program to put the voices of the most marginalized people in our community at the center of this process. Currently about 80% of GoDurham riders are people of color, about 68% are zero-vehicle, transit-dependent households and about 53% of these riders make less than $15,000 per year. I agree that sustainable transportation is essential and I agree that focusing on making sure residents can access jobs within 30–60 minutes is also essential. But I think we need to make sure residents are getting access to not just any jobs but jobs that provide self-sustaining wages. This should be part of any such criteria. And we do have these jobs in Durham. In fact, we have the highest-wage jobs in North Carolina. Since 2019, as Chair of our board, I have helped create nearly 3,000 new good paying jobs. About half of them are accessible to people with a high-school degree and certification or associate degree and with starting salaries of about $50,000 per year plus benefits. Most of these jobs are in RTP or Treyburn Industrial Park so the focus also needs to be on our education-to-jobs pipeline, and determining where to direct these sustainable transportation connections. I consider the issues of poverty, access to good-paying jobs, affordable housing and affordable, reliable and convenient transportation to be intertwined.  The priorities and needs of our transit-dependent residents will need to be centered in this decision-making process. 

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050?  

I consider climate change to be an urgent crisis that demands urgent action and must be prioritized. I supported the adoption of Durham County’s Renewable Energy Resolution that commits to 40% use of renewables by 2040 and 100% renewables by 2050 so these emissions targets are consistent with these aspirational goals. I signed the Green New Deal pledge. I am helping lead the NC Solar Schools Initiative to provide solar energy at no cost to our schools, help decentralize our power grid and increase the use of renewable energy throughout our communities. This issue is a personal priority for me. 

In the face of climate change, I agree we have no choice but to work toward these goals. But again, it is also important to hear the priorities from the community that will come out of the ENGAGEDurham process. Every priority and choice that is incorporated into the updated land use and transit plans will have trade-offs and price tags associated with them. We as a community will need to understand the decisions and choices we are making and build consensus around our goals so that we can move forward together and successfully implement our revised transit and land use plans 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree)

Agree. As noted above, I look forward to considering the priorities that emerge from the community-based ENGAGEDurham process that will help guide the framework for our revised transit and land-use plans. The first step would be to incorporate goals toward Zero Emissions into our plans and then develop specific targets and strategies to help us meet these goals. Developing a funding strategy and plan will be critical as upfront costs are one of the biggest barriers. GoTriangle recently purchased our first two Proterra electric buses. We were able to do so with a $943,000 federal grant and $100,000 Duke Energy grant for charging stations. Electric buses cost $300,000 to $450,000 more than diesel buses but over their lifespan will save more than $250,000 to $400,000 so we will need to have a comprehensive approach of looking at capital and operational costs, and also a method to assess associated environmental impact costs and benefits.  Difficult decisions about funding priorities will have to be made due to limited and inadequate local, state and federal funding for transportation, especially non-car-centered transportation. Challenging choices may involve, for example, whether to put limited resources toward addressing equitable access and racial and economic disparities by investing in more frequent, affordable, reliable and convenient transportation or purchase of electric buses to meet zero goals. 

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham?

I am 100% committed to these goals and I would also add equitable and healthy and sustainable as part of “clean.” As Chair of the Board of County Commissioners, member of the GoTriangle Board of Trustees, Chair of the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization, member of the Joint City County Planning Committee and Co-Chair of the Triangle J Council of Governments Smart Growth Committee, I am working hard for an effective, sustainable and accessible local and regional transportation system. I have been a strong voice for safe and protected pedestrian and bikeways and advocated for a change in NCDOT policy to allow funding for sidewalks and bike lanes on highway projects to be re-allocated for multi-use paths. The advocacy of our MPO in collaboration with CAMPO (Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization) has helped improve the revised NCDOT Complete Streets Policy that will allow multi-use paths incorporated in project plans to be covered by NCDOT as part of the project total costs.

I worked as hard as I could for the success of the Durham-Orange Light Rail Project because I felt this was the most transformative tool we had to address poverty, manage our growth and fight climate change. I will continue to fight for the options we have to create a multi-modal system of protected and safe bike and pedestrian pathways, connected to a strong local and regional transit network that will get people to where they need to go, help us create healthy, livable places for people to live, and address systemic racial and economic inequities to create shared prosperity and health and well being for all. I believe we are at a turning point in Durham’s history where we have tremendous opportunities with economic development and good paying jobs accessible to people of all education and skill levels and backgrounds. I believe we have the opportunity with our revised Transit and Comprehensive Land Use Plan to create the framework, blueprint and vision for how we create a sustainable, equitable and just future in Durham. I am committed to this future.

Back to list

Matt Kopac

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so? 

For this question, I will share my present, past and future. These days I primarily drive. This is because my younger son is in pre-school in south Durham, and I do not have walk, bike or transit options to get him to school. Before kids and during the first few years of my kid’s lives, I commuted by bike or bus almost every day. My wife and I have purposefully tried to orient our lives to accommodate non-car multi-modal transit options, including living and working closer to our jobs. This worked well until the pre-school situation. Currently, we make the effort to at least shift our weekend mobility to biking and walking. However, I am excited for next year. We already walk my older son to his elementary school at Club Boulevard and next year both of my kids will be in public school close to our home. We are looking forward to being able to walk with our boys to school and then being able to bike or bus to work almost every day (at least until middle school!). 

While this is a near ideal scenario for our family, what we’re lacking is the freedom for our kids to safely explore their neighborhood by themselves on foot or bike. As is the case in much of Durham, there are limited sidewalks near our home and traffic that is really too fast for a neighborhood, which makes us scared for our kids’ safety. 

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go? 

I am a pretty confident cyclist and live close to a greenway so I generally feel pretty safe, though I have to stick to circumscribed routes. I also feel safe riding our buses which are quite nice and convenient with on-board wifi. Although I don’t typically take my kids on the bus, I would feel comfortable doing so. I have only been able to get where I want to go because we had the privilege to be able to afford to live closer to better bike routes and close to a bus route. We’re also fortunate to have employment near our home. However, we do not always feel safe when out walking and biking with our kids due to traffic speeds and volume. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025. 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

I would strongly agree that our Transit Plan needs to embrace a holistic view of mobility, and shift from the historic mindset of prioritizing cars and speed. Walking, biking and other LIT forms of transit are the most affordable, accessible and healthy forms of transit for individuals and our community—provided that the routes are safe. Proposals like the LSN must be integral elements of a long-term strategy to reduce our dependence on personal automobiles, as they help to tip the scales of human behavior quickly. In terms of funding, I look forward to better understanding the allocation required and the timeframe to make LSN a reality. 

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars. 

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes? Why or why not? 

Affordable, sustainable transit has been a key provision of my plan for affordability. Yes we need more affordable housing construction and yes we need more job creation for local residents, but if we had multi-modal, regionally-integrated transit options for people with low incomes, people of color and people living with disabilities, that would expand affordable housing options that did not have to be located downtown, did not have to be co-located with work, or did not require so much money for gas and car maintenance. 

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050? 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

I strongly agree that zero-emissions public transit and net-zero transportation are critical goals for addressing climate change and protecting our quality of life in Durham over the long term. We know that transportation is the second-largest contributor to greenhouse gas emissions behind only our energy sector. In addition to exploring the requirements of a Low Stress Network, another step I would take towards zero emissions would be replacing outdated buses with all-electric models. 

Of course, these can be only first steps and by themselves will make only a very small dent in our overall emissions. The biggest greenhouse gas reductions will come if Durhamites with cars choose other ways to get around to live, work and play. This must involve a comprehensive plan including more frequent bus service, and potential transit options like Bus Rapid Transit and commuter rail to Raleigh. We must rethink our entire transportation system in order to dramatically reduce our daily per capita Vehicle Miles per Durham’s Sustainability Roadmap. 

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham? 

I have been incredibly fortunate in my life to have had the chance to live and travel around the world, experience different systems of mobility, and learn from visionary leaders. I have ridden the world-class metro in Delhi after meeting with the “Metro Man” himself Elattuvalapil Sreedharan. I have ridden the Bus Rapid Transit System in Curitiba, Brazil (which inspired BRT around the world), and met with famed mayor and BRT visionary Jaime Lerner. I have studied the transit systems of the Netherlands including the ubiquitous bike infrastructure. I lived in Washington, DC where I got around by metro, bus, bike and on foot. At the same time I have experienced cities like Sao Paolo, Brazil, Cotonou, Benin, Los Angeles and Atlanta—cities across the developed and developing world which are literally choking on congestion. When I first came to Durham ten years ago, one of the first things I noticed was how hard it was to get around the Triangle region without a car. It was easy to envision the increased congestion and sprawl that we are facing ten years later. It is easier still to envision what the livability of Durham will be like in 20 years if we do not act. 

One of the experiences that was most heartening was meeting with the head of the Urban Planning Department for the City of Amsterdam. The first thing he did was pull out photographs from the 1970s and 1980s that showed the city overwhelmed with cars. He told me that most people believe the Dutch have always biked, when the reality is that it was good planning that changed the default option for mobility and created one of the most livable, healthiest, most environmentally sustainable cities in the world. 

I share these experiences simply to communicate that I share your vision and my commitment is strong for a future Durham with safe, affordable and clean transportation. Cities much larger and more sprawling have achieved what we’d like to see in Durham using tools that we have at our disposal, and I’m grateful to have strong community advocacy to partner with in this journey. 

Back to list

Regina Mays

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

I currently use the transit system.

If you walk, bike, and/ or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I do feel safe on transit but as for when my teens catch the buses we have to have a different conversation due to police presence at the downtown bus station and other locations they may go. Also, my children work and others know this so we have conversations about traveling with cash on them or when they want to hang out with others to shop or go to the movies and other outings. Sometimes we use the option of Lyft/ Uber because they make wise decisions based on circumstances. No, sometimes we cannot get to where we need to go especially with the recent transit changes that took place January 25th.

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025. 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

Agree.

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes? Why or Why not?

I would love to make that first priority but the reality is that your better-paying jobs are not generally in areas that will allow that to be a reality. E.g., look at where Harris Teeter and Target are not near Braggtown or Hoover Road Housing property. The recent transit plan actually had a negative impact on ridership especially for Duke and UNC employees as voiced at the recent transit meeting held at the transit terminal. For the disabled riders there needs to be more access to Durham Access Transportation which allows van services to pick individuals up at the front door and take them shopping, to work, and doctor’s appointments as well as other outings. Right now, there is a shortage of vans and drivers. We must also consider the population growth and ongoing construction not only affects the transit system but traffic as a whole. 

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050? 

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

Agree.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham? 

I will commit to holding the private industry accountable for putting safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham over profit while maintaining a profit that meets the need to pay drivers accurate wages and maintain buses. Especially, as the population continue to grow we need campaigns to support increasing ridership. It is proven that will decrease accidents, pollution, and the list goes on about the positives.

Back to list

Michael Page

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or ride transit in Durham County? If you do not use one or more of these ways to travel, what prevents you from doing so?

I currently walk in Durham county.  I do enjoy biking when I have the opportunity. 

If you walk, bike, and/or ride transit, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I do feel safe when walking in Durham.  I am able to get where I need to go. 

According to data for Durham County from the NCDOT Pedestrian and Bicyclist Crash Data Tool, in the five-year period between 2014 and 2018, there were 1,094 crashes between cars and people walking (855) or biking (239), resulting in 30 deaths and 53 suspected serious injuries. More than half of the people injured or killed were people of color. Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for rapid deployment of a “Low-Stress Network” in Durham that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city, whether walking, biking, riding a scooter, using an electric wheelchair, or any other “light individual transportation” (LIT) device. We’re calling for 125 miles of this connected set of protected LIT lanes, greenways, and slow streets to be completed by 2025.  

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree to support funding this network as part of the Durham County Transit Plan. Below the scale, justify your response.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

Agree.

Too many people with low incomes, predominantly people of color, but also many people living with disabilities, have inadequate access to jobs, healthcare, groceries and services because, for decades, our transportation system and land use has been designed around the use of private cars.  

With the updates to the County Transit Plan and the Comprehensive Plan, will you agree to establish as a first priority increasing the number of jobs that people with low incomes, people of color, and people living with disabilities can access with sustainable transportation within 30 and 60 minutes?  Why or why not?

If elected I would be happy to establish a plan for people with certain disabilities to be able to access transportation in a timely manner particularly in a 30–60 minute time frame.  I deem this a priority because it is not a good use of time for residents to spend so much time waiting for transportation and with the various transit connections and stops this could be alleviated.   

There is no denying that we are in a climate crisis. With the updates to the County Transit Plan, the Comprehensive Plan, and the region’s long-range transportation plan, will you agree to establish a goal of a zero emission public transit system in Durham by 2035, and a complete net-zero transportation system in Durham by 2050?   

On the following scale, indicate how much you agree with this idea. Below the scale, explain the first step you would take toward zero emissions or justify why zero emissions is not a first priority for you.

(Disagree/Somewhat Disagree/Neutral/Somewhat Agree/Agree) 

I would check agree, I think that is a fair assumption to move our community along in reducing this emission. I also believe that if we had adequate transit then we would be able to further advance this cause so that people would be directed to a single mode of transportation. Of course for a healthy sustainable community, walking and biking should be viewed as a single most choice of transportation.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable, and clean transportation in Durham?

I am very committed to safe and affordable and clean transportation in Durham as I would continue to uphold and support recommendations from our Environmental Services Board and also other safety citizen-based committees that promote healthy and sustainable living.  I would regularly support media campaigns to educate our community about clean systems in place, and support community-interest meetings to gain more influence from citizens on building a clean system. I remain a proponent of this cause.

Back to list

Bike Durham's Letters on DCHC-MPO’s Transportation Demand Management Plan and Transportation Improvement Program

On behalf of Bike Durham, John Tallmadge—who's recently joined the Advocacy Committee (and soon will be doing more)—attended a Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC-MPO) board meeting on Wednesday, December 11. The MPO makes transportation policy and directs federal funds, so they have a lot of influence on the state of our streets and transit system.

Last week, the MPO took public comments on their draft Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan and their draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Below are Bike Durham’s letters commenting on the plans. This time, the comments and presentation were for the purpose of thanking the Board members for their past leadership, and letting them know that Bike Durham supports their commitments to infrastructure and programming to make biking, walking, and transit safer and more attractive. While this message, and other behind-the-scenes work, doesn’t require a strong push from members, its effectiveness does rely on a strong Bike Durham membership base. We thank you for becoming a member, and ask that you consider becoming a Sustainer by contributing monthly rather than annually. The Board and Advocacy Committee are working to bring other opportunities forward in the near future for members to get directly involved with our advocacy efforts.

Bike Durham Color Logo smaller.jpg

To:     Dale McKeel, Transportation Planner
From:     Bike Durham
Date:     December 10, 2019
Re:     Public Comment on Draft Transportation Demand Management Plan

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Draft Transportation Demand Management Plan and thank you for the MPO’s long-term dedication to funding transportation demand management activities on a regional basis.  As you know, TDM strategies have demonstrated themselves to be the most cost-effective strategies for addressing congestion and for getting the most out of the transportation infrastructure and services that we already have.  Bike Durham has the following comments on this draft plan:

  1. We support Goal 1 to refine and enhance evaluation methods.  We believe that one of the important outcomes of achieving this goal is that it will give program implementers the tools to continue pursuing and expanding what is working to reduce vehicle miles traveled, and we think that should be stated.  We also believe that the metrics selected must enable the implementers and the public to understand whether the programs and their impacts are equitably distributed. Performance indicators that measure total or average impacts are valuable, but insufficient.  Performance indicators must also measure for whom the program is working or negatively affecting and the ultimate targets that are established should be seeking to demonstrate benefits in the region’s most transportation-disadvantaged neighborhoods.

  2. We support Goal 2 to align funding cycles with performance.  However, we would like to see a budget developed to achieve the broad activities that are included in this plan.  It appears that the plan is calling for an expansion of TDM activities, and Bike Durham supports an increase in the funding for TDM strategies across the Triangle region.

  3. We support Goal 3 to expand program marketing and outreach.  Since “widespread” is not defined, this outcome should include reference to commuters who have low-income levels and who are people of color.  Low-income commuters are the most likely to be currently using transit, biking, or walking to work. Programming to serve low-income commuters and people of color will align TDM strategies with other community goals to make our region equitable.  Implementing agencies should recognize that different social media channels, and different messages will be needed to effectively “reach” low-income communities and people of color. This should also include inclusion of recent immigrants who have limited English proficiency.

  4. We support the activity to organize educational events, and recommend that some of these events should be specific to how changes to infrastructure spending and land use planning in other communities have led to very different mode splits than those we see in the Triangle.  We also recommend educational events on the social and racial inequities that exist in our current transportation system and the policymaking that has led to them.

  5. We support Goal 4 to get innovative and encourage you to consider non-profit organizations as potential partners for implementing innovations.  We encourage you to consider funding commitments longer than a single year for innovative projects. We also encourage you to consider lower matching requirements from partner organizations for innovative projects.

  6. We also support Goal 5 to integrate TDM efforts with local and regional planning efforts.  We encourage you to consider the fact that the policy analysis required to effectively implement these activities will demand a complementary skill set to that required for outreach and marketing activities.  This plan should be identifying needed staff positions, the organizations where they can most effectively work, and the required budget to fund them.    

We believe that this would have been a stronger document if the outreach had also included advocacy groups, like Bike Durham, and representative commuters.  Bike Durham has appreciated the partnership we have had with several of the TDM implementing agencies around Bike-to-Work programming. We support this work beyond those bicycling-specific promotions and would like to be included more broadly. 

Sincerely, 
Bike Durham Advocacy Committee


Bike Durham Color Logo smaller.jpg

To: Aaron Cain, Transportation Planner
From: Bike Durham
Date: December 10, 2019 
Re: Public Comment on Draft FY2020-29 Transportation Improvement Program 

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Draft Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and thank you for the MPO’s long-term dedication to prioritize projects that improve bicycling, walking, and riding transit in the region. We understand that there are significant obstacles to achieving the MPO’s long-range plans due to policies at NCDOT and laws established by the General Assembly. Bike Durham seeks to be a partner in working to align those state policies and laws with a transportation vision that achieves safe streets for all users, reductions in vehicle miles traveled, and equitable access for our most transportation-disadvantaged residents who are predominantly low-income and people of color. In that spirit, Bike Durham has the following comments on this draft TIP: 

  1. We support and appreciate all the bicycle, pedestrian and transit projects that were submitted for scoring and funding. We also support and appreciate the inclusion of bicycle and pedestrian elements in street and highway project definitions. We request that these project definitions be updated to specify that the projects are to include protected bike facilities, and not just paint. 2. We are concerned about the delays to improving unsafe conditions for people walking and biking on many Durham streets. Since few projects are funded with improvements that will improve the safety of people walking and biking, we request that the MPO communicate to NCDOT and the local municipal transportation departments that funds available for safety projects (W-5205, W-5705DIV, W-5705REG, W-5705SW, and the corresponding funds in Divisions 7 and 8) be prioritized to protect the safety of our most vulnerable users of our streets and highways. Improvements to NC 98 are not programmed to begin until FY2029. This segment of roadway has been the scene of multiple deaths from people hit by vehicles, the most recent on September 7th of this year. These improvements cannot wait 10 years. 3. We are concerned that the programmed projects include much greater spending on projects that will add highway-capacity, and thus increase vehicle miles traveled than spending on projects that will support shifts to biking, walking, and transit. We are aware that the untimely demise of the light rail project is a major contributor to this imbalance. 

    We also understand that NCDOT policy and state law are obstacles. We are also concerned about the inclusion of expensive projects to expand highway capacity on I-85 and the Durham Freeway. Due to the climate crisis, we want to communicate the urgency of investing in a safe network of bicycling and walking facilities throughout Durham and the region, and in a new vision for transit. There are limited funds available for transportation infrastructure, and Bike Durham intends to be active in advocating in the upcoming months and years for building out safe, high-quality networks for biking, walking, and transit in our region. 4. We are also concerned that there is no analysis included that indicates whether the implementation of this program of projects will lead to greater equity of access for transportation-disadvantaged individuals or communities, especially communities of color. We think that this is critical for achieving community goals, and request that the MPO Board direct the staff to work with the NCDOT to develop these analytical tools. 5. Finally, we appreciate the effort that the staff has undertaken to make this very dense material more accessible to the public. We have a few suggestions for improving the legibility of the next version of this document for the FY2022-31 draft TIP. 

  2. It would be helpful to see a table that summarizes the programmed spending by project type, for example highway capacity expansion, highway maintenance, complete street, independent bicycle or pedestrian facility, operational/ITS, transit infrastructure, transit vehicles, etc. This should be compared to a second table of the value of the submitted projects in the same categories so that it’s clear what percentage of various project types are funded, and what the unfunded levels are for each project type. 

  3. The appendix C table is a good way of bringing transparency to the point allocation process. We recommend that future versions provide an explanation for projects that have not received funding even though they have scored higher than other funded projects. There were 8 regional projects and 4 divisional projects that fit this condition. 

Again, we appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft TIP. You can count on Bike Durham to stay engaged. 

Sincerely, 
Bike Durham Advocacy Committee 


Shaina Nanavati Reports from the Untokening

In October, Bike Durham sponsored member Shaina Nanavati’s attendance at the Untokening conference in Durham. Here’s her report on what she found there.

Centering Community Voices for Mobility Justice

Shaina Nanavati

In October, I attended Untokening: Durham, a convening of mobility justice advocates that centers BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, People of Color) experiences and voices. Though I met a lot of awesome young transportation planners from around the country, the focus of the weekend was on Durham. I’m not a planner myself; I am a climate activist turned community organizer. I love being outside and hate fossil fuels, which is why I advocate for safe transportation alternatives to cars.

There are many reasons why people rely on methods other than driving a single passenger vehicle to get from place to place. Mobility justice is the concept that all of these people and their reasons must be accounted for within our transportation systems. If you want an exact definition, I recommend going directly to the source: the Principles of Mobility Justice were drafted after the first Untokening convening in Atlanta in 2016. While transportation planners around the country should be using this framework as a starting point for re-thinking their systems of design, the concepts themselves seem obvious to any person of color who has tried to travel from one point to another using a car or otherwise. Mobility justice necessitates shifting the conversation away from modes of transit to the identities of the people using those modes by centering the experiences of vulnerable communities. 

Centering the voices of marginalized people means listening to us. It means calling attention to our life experiences and learning how to create solutions to meet our communities’ needs. Historically, cities have been planned by white men for white men. The majority of people in Durham who walk, bike, and take the bus do so because they cannot afford to drive. Our current transportation system glorifies the individual by creating a car-centric society. A truly comprehensive roadmap for the future of Durham has to take a community-based approach.

As Durham begins to update its comprehensive plan, the City-County planning department has been trying to figure out how to make sure it takes into consideration the voices of as many of Durham’s residents as possible. It’s not just about the numbers, it’s about making sure they’re hearing from a sample that accurately represents the experiences and demographics of the city. Advocacy groups such as Bike Durham have the ability to speak on behalf of many residents. These conversations must center the voices of marginalized communities. 

The easiest way to reach any community is to go to it. What else matters to people who can’t afford to or can’t legally drive? Social and political issues such as living wages, affordable housing, immigration, and mass incarceration are very real day-to-day issues for a lot of black and brown people. We also care about the same things as everyone else – the safety of our children’s schools, our neighborhoods, and the places we work and have fun. We’re already having conversations about our streets. Usually they’re about more than just bike lanes

Real community involvement starts with letting communities set their own agendas. When you ask people what they want to see changed within their neighborhoods, you are not asking them to support a vision they had no say in defining. You’re giving them space to voice their own visions, and you’re trusting their expertise. Earlier this year, the city of Durham put out a draft Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint that has some great recommendations. Knock on doors and talk to people at bus stops. Attend their celebrations and speak their languages. Be intentional and be willing to put resources toward such outreach. On the way out to meet them, you’ll start to see the streets the way they do. 

City Council Candidate Questionnaire

The Durham City Council election is Tuesday, November 5. We sent each candidate a questionnaire so they could tell our members and the general public where they stand on bicycle, pedestrian, and transit infrastructure in Durham. So far, three of the six candidates have responded; if/when the other candidates submit responses, we'll include them here.

Affordable Housing Bond

Bike Durham strongly recommends a vote of “Yes” on Durham’s Affordable Housing Bond. Building off the City’s approval of Expanding Housing Choices, the Affordable Housing Bond represents a critical funding source for the much needed all-of-the-above strategy to address Durham’s housing affordability crisis. Bike Durham supports efforts that allow people of varying incomes to live near jobs, transit, and services, thereby providing them with options to travel by ways other than driving. Please vote “Yes” on the Affordable Housing Bond measure for a more sustainable Durham.

Be sure to vote! Support the candidates who support your right to safe and equitable transportation, and help alleviate the crisis in affordable housing! Early voting begins October 16. Find your voting site here.

Click a name to jump to that candidate’s response:


Javiera Caballero

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or take transit in Durham? If you do not use one or more of these modes, what prevents you from doing so?

I walk a lot and have bike commuted in Durham, but do not currently bike to work. I am not on a bus route even though I live close to downtown. I would ride the bus, but depending on the bus route I take it would take up to 45 minutes, and to walk it would take about half an hour. I would like to recommit to biking again to work as I have done in the past.

If you walk, bike, and/or take transit in the city, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

When I have ridden my bike in Durham, it has really depended on the route I have taken whether I feel safe or not. I live close to the South Ellerbee Creek trail, so to get downtown is easy and convenient. Walking is usually safe and easy, but there are many parts of Durham that do not have good sidewalks. We also do not have safe intersection crossings at many of our schools, so that impacts children walking to and from school.

Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for a “Low-Stress Bicycle Network” in Durham, a connected set of protected bicycle lanes, greenways, and slow streets that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city by bicycle. Do you support this concept, and would you prioritize funding this network?

Yes and yes. Creating a multi-modal transit system, which includes a “Low-Stress Bicycle Network,” has to be a priority for the city. We cannot reach our sustainability goals without good walking and biking options.

Many of Durham’s streets are owned by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, which has been resistant to bicycle/pedestrian/transit-centered improvements. Should the City of Durham take over these streets?

I am really curious about this option and would like to learn more. As I have learned more about transit policy, it has become very clear that we are very limited about what we can do because the state DOT owns so many of our roads. I think it would make sense to take over key routes in Durham, but I would want to have a much better understanding of the process and costs for us to accomplish that.

7,000 people move to Durham every year. There is not enough road space for everyone if we continue to privilege automotive traffic. What actions will you take as a member of City Council to make Durham a safer and more inviting place to walk, bike, and take transit?

Below are some of the policy platform ideas from the “Bull City Together” platform. This platform was co-written with my colleagues Jillian Johnson and Charlie Reece.

  • Improve on-time performance of GoDurham transit services, expand frequency of service at night and on weekends, and prevent fare increases.

  • Implement an equitable “fare capping” system for GoDurham transit services that will ensure that riders are not penalized for paying cash for individual rides.

  • Build more bus shelters throughout the city of Durham so that more riders are protected from the elements while they wait for the bus.

  • Work closely with Durham County and our regional partners to revise the Durham County Transit Plan in a way that combines deep and equitable community engagement with cutting edge transit solutions to our region’s 21st-century transportation challenges.

  • Fully fund the remainder of the 2011 Trails & Greenways Master Plan.

  • Develop an action plan for the funding and construction of the remaining sidewalk, bicycle and intersection improvement projects identified in the 2017 Durham Bike+Walk Implementation Plan.

  • Complete and fund the Vision Zero Action Plan requested by the City Council in 2017 with the stated goal of zero traffic fatalities on Durham roadways.

  • Expand Durham’s current system of bike lanes as part of a low stress cycling network throughout the city composed of not only protected bike lanes but also bicycle boulevards.

  • Continue to build more sidewalks throughout Durham but especially in parts of the city that are sidewalk poor.

  • Encourage pilot projects throughout Durham that showcase the latest thinking in transportation planning and design, possibly including a downtown pedestrian plaza and a “pedestrian scramble” in downtown Durham.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable transportation in Durham?

We need a good mass transit system, and we needed it at least a decade ago. Currently Durham’s planning department is leading the effort for the next iteration of our transit plan; they are working closely with GoTriangle, and that will give us a strong end product. We have clear evidence that the planning department takes equitable engagement seriously, and I am confident that they will do the necessary work to ensure robust stakeholder input is included in the process. The commuter rail between Durham and Raleigh is an important component for our next transit plan. Determining the best transit option between Durham and Chapel Hill is critical and at this point the most viable option seems to be BRT (Bus Rapid Transit), but that still needs to be determined. Increased busing in Durham proper will also need to be addressed, as will thinking through multi-modal transit ideas, such as improved and increased options for walking and biking. Above I shared some specific policy ideas that I believe would help move our transit policy forward in a meaningful way.

 

Jillian Johnson

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or take transit in Durham? If you do not use one or more of these modes, what prevents you from doing so?

I regularly walk and use transit in Durham, but I don’t bike much. I’m not a very strong cyclist, and I don’t currently own a bike. When I did own a bike, I was an occasional trail user, and biked to work when the weather was nice.

If you walk, bike, and/or take transit in the city, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I feel safe walking and taking transit in the city of Durham, and I’m lucky to live in an area of town with robust bus service and some sidewalks, though we could certainly use more. I know that the majority of the city does not have this privilege, and that many residents live in areas where bus service is limited or unavailable and don’t have access to sidewalks or safe bike lanes for cycling.

Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for a “Low-Stress Bicycle Network” in Durham, a connected set of protected bicycle lanes, greenways, and slow streets that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city by bicycle. Do you support this concept, and would you prioritize funding this network?

I fully support the concept of a low-stress bicycle network, and agree that it’s important to create the network as a whole, rather than in pieces, so that people can commute safely. I believe this is an important priority for Durham’s transportation future, and that sustainable transportation infrastructure needs to be a higher priority in city spending plans. Both growth and climate change raise the importance of this issue more each year. I look forward to enthusiastically supporting funding requests for this work.

Many of Durham’s streets are owned by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, which has been resistant to bicycle/pedestrian/transit-centered improvements. Should the City of Durham take over these streets?

The benefit of taking over these streets is clear, but the costs are significant. The city does not have the funding required to maintain these streets, and I don’t think we should raise taxes to provide a service which should be provided by the State of NC. I would support the city stepping in to maintain state roads if we could receive funding from the state to ensure this cost does not fall on the residents of Durham.

7,000 people move to Durham every year. There is not enough road space for everyone if we continue to privilege automotive traffic. What actions will you take as a member of City Council to make Durham a safer and more inviting place to walk, bike, and take transit?

I will continue to support increased investment in our bus system, trails, sidewalks, and bike lanes. I’m also excited about a current city effort, funded by a Bloomberg grant, to use behavioral science techniques to discourage personal vehicle trips. As traffic gets worse, more and more of our residents will be looking for other transportation solutions, and we need to have options ready for them.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable transportation in Durham?

Here are the points in my platform, joint with Javiera Caballero & Charlie Reece, that relate to this issue:

  • Improve on-time performance of GoDurham transit services, expand frequency of service at night and on weekends, and prevent fare increases.

  • Implement an equitable “fare capping” system for GoDurham transit services that will ensure that riders are not penalized for paying cash for individual rides.

  • Build more bus shelters throughout the city of Durham so that more riders are protected from the elements while they wait for the bus.

  • Work closely with Durham County and our regional partners to revise the Durham County Transit Plan in a way that combines deep and equitable community engagement with cutting edge transit solutions to our region’s 21st-century transportation challenges.

  • Fully fund the remainder of the 2011 Trails & Greenways Master Plan.

  • Develop an action plan for the funding and construction of the remaining sidewalk, bicycle and intersection improvement projects identified in the 2017 Durham Bike+Walk Implementation Plan.

  • Complete and fund the Vision Zero Action Plan requested by the City Council in 2017 with the stated goal of zero traffic fatalities on Durham roadways.

  • Expand Durham’s current system of bike lanes as part of a low stress cycling network throughout the city composed of not only protected bike lanes but also bicycle boulevards.

  • Continue to build more sidewalks throughout Durham but especially in parts of the city that are sidewalk poor.

  • Encourage pilot projects throughout Durham that showcase the latest thinking in transportation planning and design, possibly including a downtown pedestrian plaza and a “pedestrian scramble” in downtown Durham.

 

Charlie Reece

Do you currently walk, bike, and/or take transit in Durham? If you do not use one or more of these modes, what prevents you from doing so?

For the last six months or so, I set a goal of replacing at least one day of car trips per week with cycling or riding the bus. I’m proud to say that I’ve succeeded more than I’ve failed, though a nagging knee injury has prevented me from riding my bike as much as I’d like. In order to walk from my home to City Hall downtown, I would need to set aside 4.5 hours roundtrip, and frankly it’s rare that I have a day when I can do that. The challenges I face when trying to integrate more of these modes of transportation into my daily routine are the same challenges faced by lots of Durham residents—lack of a more robust network of protected bike lanes, not enough greenway trails to make running, biking and walking a more viable option for more folks, and a bus system that doesn’t go to enough places, doesn’t run often enough, and doesn’t run late enough at night. So we have a lot of work to do here in Durham!

If you walk, bike, and/or take transit in the city, do you feel safe? Can you get where you need to go?

I have always felt safe taking the bus in Durham. When walking and biking, I’d say it depends—when I’m on the American Tobacco Trail and in parts of the city where there are more sidewalks and more bike lanes, I feel very safe. But sometimes I’m walking or biking in parts of the city where the city does not have as robust a network of sidewalks and bike lanes as we would like, and those experiences can be disconcerting (or even a little scary). But I think it’s important for elected officials to experience these kinds of environments so that we can have a better understanding of how far we still have to go in Durham.

Bike Durham is presently finalizing a proposal for a “Low-Stress Bicycle Network” in Durham, a connected set of protected bicycle lanes, greenways, and slow streets that would enable people to travel safely and comfortably throughout most of the city by bicycle. Do you support this concept, and would you prioritize funding this network?

I am a huge supporter of the concept of a low-stress bicycle network for the city of Durham, because such a network is a critical component of the larger project to make Durham a less car-dependent community. Making it easier for folks to get around in some way other than driving their cars is absolutely essential to building a safer, healthier and more sustainable Durham. I would definitely prioritize funding for a low-stress bicycle network.

Many of Durham’s streets are owned by the North Carolina Department of Transportation, which has been resistant to bicycle/pedestrian/transit-centered improvements. Should the City of Durham take over these streets?

I don’t know if there is a mechanism for having the city “take over” streets from the state of North Carolina. It’s not clear to me that there is any kind of funding available from the state for maintenance of such streets. My personal experience is that persistent advocacy with NCDOT can make change happen, whether it’s trying to get the state to reduce a speed limit on a state road (which I was successful in doing at the request of a nearby neighborhood on Hebron Road in the northeastern part of the city earlier this year), or repeatedly insisting that more can be done to improve pedestrian safety at dangerous intersections involving state roads across the city (which has resulted in the recent installation of a traffic light at South Mangum and South Dillard Streets). But to engage in that kind of persistent advocacy, we need elected officials who are not only eager to engage with Durham residents to identify these kinds of problems, but also capable of the kind of sustained engagement with NCDOT (often over months and years) to implement solutions to those problems. I believe that I’ve demonstrated my ability to do those things over the last four years.

7,000 people move to Durham every year. There is not enough road space for everyone if we continue to privilege automotive traffic. What actions will you take as a member of City Council to make Durham a safer and more inviting place to walk, bike, and take transit?

Over the next few years, the city of Durham must focus more time, attention and money on building a safer, more equitable and more environmentally friendly way to think about transportation in Durham. We have a moral imperative to map out a future which prioritizes public transit by keeping bus fares low while expanding service, reducing wait times and building more bus shelters; to promote traffic calming measures to reduce the dangers posed to cyclists and pedestrians by cars and trucks, and to make our streets safer for everyone; and to invest in more sidewalks and protected bike lanes and greenway trails to make walking and cycling truly viable commuting options for more and more Durham residents. By making progress on these issues, we can break our city’s disastrous reliance on cars and trucks that burn fossil fuels and build a safer, healthier and more sustainable Durham.

From a regional transit perspective, the demise of the Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project requires even closer collaboration between Durham and our regional partners to develop alternatives to light rail that reduce traffic congestion, meet our region’s growing transportation demands, combat sprawl, and address the critical environmental crisis of global climate change. That’s a tall order, but I know we’re up to the challenge.

The alternatives to light rail look both east and west. To the east, along the I-40 corridor, we must move forward with commuter rail between Wake and Durham Counties; to the west, along the NC 54/US 15-501 corridor, we must move quickly to develop bus rapid transit between Orange and Durham Counties, perhaps along a dedicated route that uses the alignment already acquired for light rail.

These ideas will be more fully developed in the revised Durham County Transit Plan, which is currently underway. As a member of the Durham City Council and a member of our regional transportation planning organization (the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization), I will continue to be a forceful advocate for expanding both local and regional transit, as well as cycling and pedestrian infrastructure.

What else can you tell us about your commitment to safe, affordable transportation in Durham?

For the last four years, I have been the city council’s leading advocate for reducing Durham’s dependence on cars through improving our city’s public transit system, expanding our city’s network of bike lanes (especially protected lanes) and greenway trails, and building more sidewalks across Durham. This work is especially important to making our city safer for users of all modes of transportation, to improving the health of city residents, and to achieving the city’s ambitious sustainability and renewable energy goals. Bike Durham has been an important ally in that work, and I am eager to continue my partnership with Bike Durham to make our city a less car-centric community over the next four years.

Make Your Voice Heard! The Move Durham Survey

Introduction

The City of Durham is setting a vision for several key transportation corridors in and near downtown Durham. Bike Durham is excited that the City is soliciting input on the future of these important streets. We believe the City should, in general, put people above cars in all of the designs. This means allocating precious street space to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit users. If you have limited time, please tell them that here.

However, the City is soliciting detailed feedback on proposed designs for each street. Bike Durham has developed the following guide for how to vote on each of the corridors. This information is based on our technical expertise about best practices that increase safety for multi-modal transportation options.

*Before you click the button, keep reading to get our recommendations.
The survey is open through August 31st, 2019.


Survey Directions

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.00.24 PM.png

When you begin the survey, you’ll see a set of eight priority streets.

Click on the street you want to give input on, then scroll down to the survey link and click it to begin the survey. The first page of the survey asks how you currently use the street, how you’d like to use it, etc. For many of the streets, the second page of the survey divides the corridor into segments, and walks you through different design alternatives for each segment. Your choice for each design is:

  • I support this option

  • I DO NOT support this option

And then you are given a space to share your thoughts.


Elizabeth/Fayetteville Street

Elizabeth Street: Ramseur to Holloway

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.53.22 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 2: Landscaped Medians w/Turn Pockets + Pedestrian Refuge Islands

Alternative 1 and 2 both have protected bike lanes, which is Bike Durham’s highest priority—we’re advocating for a “low-stress network” (LSN) of such lanes. They would provide continuous protection from car traffic on key corridors, with as few interruptions of protection as possible, and they would connect to one another so people could ride safely and confidently from origin to destination. Alternative 2 features a median, which is important for pedestrians crossing the street: The presence of a median has been shown to reduce pedestrian crashes by 40%. And vertical elements in or next to roadways, like trees planted in medians, tend to reduce traffic speed, which results in fewer and less harmful collisions.

Fayetteville Street: Limited Access Transition (Highway 147 Overpass)

  • Support Phase I 

  • Support Long Term Vision: Three Lanes with Buffered Bike Lanes and Wide Sidewalks

Fayetteville Street: Commercial (Umstead to Lakewood)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.51.38 PM.png
  • Support Phase I

  • Support Long Term Vision 3: Bus Lanes + High Frequency Transit, Curb-Separated Bike Lane, and Pedestrian Refuge Islands

Bike Durham advocates for increased transit accessibility and pedestrian amenities as well as bicycle-focused infrastructure. Alternative 1 has bus lanes without protected bike lanes. Alternative 2 is vice-versa. Alternative 3 is the best of all worlds: Bus lanes with stop improvements, and maximally protected bike paths. This is the sort of street plan we’d like to see everywhere the right-of-way width allows for it.

Fayetteville Street: Mixed Use, Residential, and Institutional (Cecil to Umstead)

  • Support Traffic Calming and Pedestrian Safety Treatment Examples

While it would be difficult to put bicycle infrastructure in this narrow roadway, Bike Durham would like the city to identify a parallel street or trail nearby to include in a low-stress network.

Duke/Gregson/Vickers Street

Residential, Mixed-Use, and Downtown (University to Club)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 9.26.34 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 3: Two-Way with Parking

Few cyclists dare to ride on Duke or Gregson because people tend to drive frighteningly fast on these two-lane, one-way streets. In this case, we forgo recommending bike lanes in order to protect drivers and pedestrians from the dangerously high speeds that the current one-way design enables. Two-way streets would significantly calm traffic in these residential neighborhoods, and cyclists can instead use parallel streets and greenways such as Watts Street and the American Tobacco Trail.

Alston Avenue/Avondale Drive

Avondale Drive: Residential, Mixed-Use, and Commercial (Alston to Knox)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.54.50 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 2: Multi-Use Path and Transit Amenities

We prefer Alternative 2 because the multi-use path separates bicycles from cars.

Alston Avenue: Residential, Mixed-Use, and Industrial (Holloway to Avondale)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.55.55 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 3: Bike Lanes and Transit Amenities, BUT need to add either protected bike lanes or a multi-use path

We think bike lanes are crucial for this key north-south corridor, but we don’t understand why this alternative doesn’t protect them. We urge the city to modify the design to protect the bike lanes.

Chapel Hill Street

Limited Access Road Transition (Shepherd to Gregson)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.57.08 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 3: Reduce Lanes, Buffered/Separated Bike Lanes, Wider Sidewalks

Alternative 2 and 3 are identical, save for the widths of the sidewalks and travel lanes. The narrower drive lanes in Alternative 3 would slow car traffic, which saves lives.

Downtown (Gregson to Ramseur)

  • Support Alternative 1: Streetscape Improvements, Buffered Bike Lanes

Commercial (Kent to Shepherd)

Screen Shot on 2019-08-16 at 17_33_30.png
  • Support Alternative 2: Separated Bike Lanes

This is a simple choice between buffered and non-buffered bike lanes.

Downtown Loop

Morgan Street (Roxboro to Chapel Hill)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 10.59.25 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 1: Two-Way Conversion, Protected Bikeway

We strongly support the conversion of the downtown loop from a one-way to a two-way thoroughfare. There is little justification for the present one-way design; because the north-south streets that pass through it are heavily traveled, and thus prioritized by traffic signals, the loop hardly achieves the purpose of one-way streets, which is to move cars through quickly. Converting to two-way streets would calm traffic while making it less confusing to navigate downtown. Alternative 1 is the only one among these alternatives to include protected bike lanes. We would prefer Alternative 2 if they tweaked the design to buffer the bike lanes.

Ramseur Street (Chapel Hill to Roxboro)

Screen Shot 2019-08-09 at 11.00.24 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 2: Two-Way Conversion, Bus Lane + High Frequency Transit, Shared Use Path

All three of these designs feature protected bikeways. We advocate for Alternative 2 because it includes a bus-only lane, which is well-suited to Ramseur Street.

Roxboro/Mangum Street

Residential/Mixed-Use (Corporation to Markham)

Screen Shot 2019-08-12 at 3.19.09 PM.png
  • Support Alternative 1: One-Way w/Protected Bikeway

Our choice here would maximize bicycle safety with a fully curb-protected cycle track.

MangUm: Downtown (from Dillard to corporation)

Screen Shot on 2019-08-16 at 17_33_30.png
  • Support Alternative 3: Two-Way Protected Bikeway, Wider Sidewalks.

Our choice here would maximize bicycle safety with a fully curb-protected cycle track.

Roxboro: Downtown (Dillard to Elliott)

We don’t support any of these options. Alternative 1 is the least-bad because of the presence of the bike lane. However, placing a bike lane to the left of a parking lane with no buffer creates a car-door minefield. In the comments, please urge the city to come up with a better solution.




Holloway Street

Holloway Street and North Hyde Park Ave 

  • Support Redesign

Holloway Street and Oakwood Ave 

  • Support Version 1 or 2

We’re agnostic on these intersection designs. We want to see protected bike lanes on the west end of Holloway Street, between Roxboro and Dillard—if you like, you can note this in the comments.

Durham Freeway

  • Some points for you to add in the text box asking “What can be done to reconnect communities negatively impacted by construction of the Durham Freeway to other parts of the City?” could include: Better bike/ped access on the streets that cross the Durham Freeway.

The survey asks, “Did you know?” Many Durhamites do know that when the Durham Freeway was built, it tore through the heart of Hayti and other central neighborhoods, displacing homes, businesses, and churches, and cutting parts of the city off from one another. While it’s too late to fully reverse the damage done, the city could benefit greatly from converting the highway to a surface street. With the East End Connector set to open in 2020, many of the freeway’s current users will have better options for moving through the city, and the imminent need to repair many of the bridges that pass over it presents the city with a unique opportunity to make a bold, epochal change before it continues throwing good money after bad. A persuasive accounting of the reasons why we advocate for the freeway’s removal can be found in this News & Observer opinion piece, written in 2016 by Bike Durham member and advisor Erik Landfried.

I'm angry. This is a call to action about the W Club Blvd Hit-and-Run.

Hi Friends,
If you're a new Bike Durham member, welcome and thanks for joining us! This is a special edition of the monthly newsletter due to a tragic hit-and-run crash that triggered some strong emotions for me personally. Durham needs to do better. Please read on, and thanks for your support.

allison.jpg
 

When will Durham get serious about Vision Zero?

Friday, May 3rd was a night of contrasts. First came the successful Bike Month kick-off party—a chance for our community to come together over a shared commitment to advocating for safer streets. A few hours later, a dark reality woke me up at 1 am in the form of police lights and caution tape outside my window. Just a few steps from my front door, I could see the mangled bike on W Club Boulevard at the intersection of N Duke Street. I watched the police measuring distances and trying to recreate the scene of this horrific hit-and-run. I didn’t dare walk closer for fear I’d see a body.

My mother was killed in a bike crash three years ago this May 25th. Seeing that mangled bike Saturday morning made me feel so angry and helpless. Just the day before I had purchased a sign to place at this same dangerous intersection where Brooke Lyn Maynard died last year in a car crash. It will read: “Drive like your mother died here” from the organization called OursDid.org. I thought maybe this would remind drivers as they approach this unsafe intersection that lives are at stake. Maybe it would make me feel like I’ve done something to help when the systemic changes we need to keep pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers safe on our streets seem so far off.

There are many differences between these two tragic crashes, and the numerous other fender-benders and “accidents” that occur at this intersection. Some may point to the victims or survivors and say they should have been safer; they shouldn’t have been walking or biking there at all; or, it was just an “accident”. I vividly recall reading the stinging comments in the coverage of my mom’s fatal bike crash—unkind and uninformed remarks about how she shouldn’t have been riding on that road. Like she didn’t deserve to be there.

The problem is: we know better.

We know that people are going to make mistakes. We know that educating the public with driver safety, or encouraging more lights for bicyclists, or putting up signs to raise awareness are all just ban-daids that won’t bring about the changes to infrastructure we so desperately need to save lives and prevent injury.

One of the key tenets of Vision Zero, a commitment that the City of Durham Transportation Department has adopted, is to shift away from the assumptions of perfect human behavior and individual responsibility and towards a model where we assume people make mistakes and the built environment should be physically designed to keep people safe (all modes: driving, biking, walking). This model de-emphasizes enforcement and education (though of course there will always be a place for education), and instead focuses on system/street design and policy improvements as proven, data-driven ways to reduce fatalities and injuries on the streets.

When cities take Vision Zero seriously they create a roadmap for action that is concrete and contains proactive strategies and policies such as:

  • Address unsafe street design with measurable goals and clear timeline for implementation.

  • Bring a paradigm shift regarding speed management, ensuring enforcement is equitable.

  • Deploy rapid response teams to urgently address safety concerns and raise awareness at crash sites.

  • Create a task force, act with transparency, and invite third party assessment of progress toward stated project goals.

Where is Durham’s actionable roadmap for Vision Zero?

In the two years since Durham adopted Vision Zero, we have not seen a plan outlining strategies, implementation timeline, or evaluation process. Where is our leadership? Yes, the City is in the midst of a national search for a new Transportation Director as the position is currently vacant. We do have an Interim Director and a capable staff and they should have two years of Vision Zero planning behind them. Why hasn’t City Council demanded action and provided the necessary resources to move Durham towards its goal of zero fatalities on our streets? (Note, the Interim Director of the Portland, OR Bureau of Transportation took impressive action on April 24th with his directive for a new, accelerated crash response protocol.)

The change is too slow.

The hit-and-run crash this weekend was on a section of W Club (between Broad and Washington) listed as a critical priority in the 2017 Bike+Walk Implementation Plan. That plan, developed by the Transportation Department, called for reducing W Club down to a two-lane road with buffered bike lanes (which should be physically protected from vehicles like the one that hit Jessica Bridger on Saturday morning) running from Broad all the way to Washington. It has been two years since this plan was adopted, why haven’t these improvements been made yet? Thirteen years ago, W Club was also listed as a "Top 20" corridor in the 2006 Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. How many more plans will it be featured in and how many more collisions will happen there before it is made safer?

We will never know if things would have turned out differently early Saturday morning had there been a protected bike lane, but we know for sure that these tragic crashes will continue if nothing changes at this intersection.

What we can do right now

Support the woman who was hit.

Jessica Bridgers is in the ICU with numerous broken bones and lacerations in addition to brain swelling. She will require multiple surgeries, and will be out of work for months, if not longer. Donate to her GoFundMe site to help her raise funds for medical expenses and a long recovery.

Join and contribute to Bike Durham.

Some might think it’s distasteful or opportunistic to ask for contributions to Bike Durham in the wake of a horrible crash. I respect that everyone can feel differently about these complicated and emotional moments. Personally, I believe that building up Bike Durham to make safe street advocacy more powerful is one concrete thing we can do right now to productively channel feelings of helplessness and rage into action.

When people get cancer, we raise money for cancer research. We donate to the organizations that are fighting to find a cure. When our family, friends, and neighbors are being killed in crashes on our streets, we should be supporting the organizations like Bike Durham that are fighting to hold the City, the Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Metropolitan Planning Organization (DCHC MPO), and the State DOT accountable to their own plans for Complete Streets and Vision Zero.

Here’s where my analogy falls short: we don't know the precise cause of every cancer and we are still seeking cures. The same is not true for preventing crashes. We do have data and proven street designs, and we do know how to lower the incidence of injuries and deaths caused by crashes on our streets:

We need to hold the City accountable for Vision Zero.

Bike Durham is trying to fund a paid staff position so we can better hold the City accountable to the Vision Zero commitment, so these tragic events don’t keep happening. Please become a member or donate today. We’re fighting to cure our streets so we can stay alive.

Ride to remember and honor those impacted

Wednesday, May 15 at 6:30 PM, CCB Plaza

Join us for the Ride of Silence: a social but silent bike ride around downtown (5 miles) to honor and remember those killed or injured while biking. All are welcome to show solidarity for the community of bicyclists and walkers who have lost their lives and whose families are forever changed because our streets are not good enough.

This ride occurs in hundreds of locations worldwide on the third Wednesday in May. This year will mark the 17th annual Ride of Silence.

Our Position on Helmets and Police at Rides

Bike Durham board members and volunteers have been grappling with tough questions and instead of keeping the conversation to ourselves, we think it’s important to create dialogue around these sensitive and sometimes deeply personal issues. Recently, in planning the annual Ride of Silence, two topics came up that gave us pause and forced us to work through some differences in perspective and experience:

  • Should we require helmets on the ride? Who would that exclude?

  • Would a police escort for the ride add to the feeling of safety or detract from it?

Ultimately, through productive discussion and open-mindedness all around, we’ve settled on some positions for the Ride of Silence that can guide us for other events as well. We encourage healthy, respectful conversation around these topics and welcome members and the biking community to talk about these things, because that’s how we can learn and grow.


Our position on helmets

We consider wearing a helmet while biking a good idea.

Many of the Bike Durham leadership wear helmets habitually. Many of us have been in crashes where helmets have helped prevent serious injury. Like bicycle lights, which are required by law at night in North Carolina, wearing a helmet helps keep your noggin safe when it hits something hard. The foundation of Bike Durham is the desire to prevent senseless deaths and foster liveable streets. Helmets and lights are part of that.

However, a lot of the time, when helmets are promoted by advocates, legislators, or transportation departments, they are pitched as a cure-all for safety, often ignoring the larger, systemic, and more obvious threats to safety. There is a simple truth that if a vehicle hits you while you are walking or biking, a helmet is usually not enough to prevent injury.  

Helmets are not the ultimate solution. Helmets provide a foam cushion when something smacks your head— they do not prevent all head injuries, they don’t stop cars, they don’t protect the rest of your body. If Bike Durham put helmets on everyone biking in Durham people would still die because of car crashes. So while we encourage helmet use, we put most of our time and effort into preventing crashes in the first place and believe that those who design our roads need to do the same.

bikeyface.png

We have chosen to prioritize changing and improving the built environment (ex: streets, sidewalks, crosswalks) over changing individual behavior. Encouraging helmet use will probably protect some noggins— just like teaching drivers the Dutch Reach probably prevents some doorings. We certainly believe in a world where everyone who wants a helmet has access to one, especially children. But we are concerned with making the biggest change with the longest effect. That’s why we’re focused on building a low-stress network that keeps you, grandma, your little nephew, everybody safe throughout the city. If you look at cities with strong bicycle infrastructure, you’ll notice that helmet usage is not the norm and it can be quite rare. Why? Because it is safe for young and old to ride their bikes without a helmet— the built environment is what creates safety.

Public education campaigns that focus on wearing helmets and reflective clothing (or pedestrians looking up from their phones) place the burden of safety on the individual biking or walking. Intended or not, these campaigns are apologetics for a car-dominant transportation system and contribute to a culture of victim-blaming in media coverage of crashes. ‘If you get hit, it was because you didn’t respect the car’s space.’ Bike Durham has a vision where it’s pleasant and normal to walk and bike to work in Durham and our advocacy should reflect that future rather than preparing everyone merely to survive the streets.

Car-centric safety campaigns on the left and political cartoons satirizing them on the right

All this leads to our last point: we are not just committed to preventing senseless deaths and injuries, but also to creating more livable streets. That happens when we build the street for everyone who uses it (all modes). And we cannot build livable streets while prioritizing car speeds. We want to build a Durham where you don’t have to gear up and wear a helmet to be safe on the roads— because those safety accessories aren’t solving the problem now anyway.

So, we don’t require helmets on our rides, though we do recommend them because we are more focused on the important factors of infrastructure and cars.

For more reading on this subject check out:
The Bike Helmet Paradox - The Atlantic
Enough With The Helmet Shaming Already - Outside Magazine

 

Our position on the police


Bike Durham is seeking to become more equity-focused, inclusive, and diverse. We’re living that out in various ways. We made this commitment essential to our formal statement of purpose. We are actively recruiting board members of color to better represent and advocate for Durham’s diversity. The leadership is attending seminars and workshops as part of our ongoing anti-racism work, and we’re challenging ourselves to think differently about everything the organization does. One way this has come up recently is around the presence of police at our events.

Every year Bike Durham hosts the Ride of Silence, as part of an international community of nearly 400 cities worldwide who organize these grassroots memorial rides on the third Wednesday every May. The slow group ride is held in complete silence to honor and remember victims of traffic violence. Traditionally, in many cities, this ride is held with the assistance of law enforcement personnel. Since the ride is silent and ride marshals cannot address the group or announce a change of plans at the moment, the police have served as escorts, commanding the respect of motor traffic on the route.  

For some, the presence of police at rides like these offers comfort and a feeling of safety as they may be already hyper-conscious of the threat cars pose to vulnerable street users. For others, police presence causes anxiety and fear. For those who live in Durham without documentation, the police often embody the ubiquitous threat of capture, deportation, and separation from their family and community. For many, especially people of color and those in poverty, the police personify a long history of excessive force and community terrorism, playing crucial roles in the mechanics of institutional racism such as the school to prison pipeline and the war on drugs.  

The reputation of violence is so deeply entangled with police that people of color and vulnerable communities avoid events where law enforcement is present. Mending those relationships and improving that reputation are worthwhile goals, but the responsibility for that reconciliation lies with the police, not with Bike Durham. This is an instance when we are not able to satisfy everyone.  

We have decided that being true to our commitment to equity, diversity, and inclusion means creating a welcoming environment for those who are usually ignored or unwelcomed in these environments. In this case, it means that we will not invite or pay the police to attend our events.

Without sacrificing safety and to ensure participants feel comfortable, we will have informed volunteer ride marshals supporting the Durham Ride of Silence. We hope you will join us!